hades

Performance

The following is a performance comparison between AHLCG plugin and Hades.

These are intended as an illustration only as hardware varies.

Card loading from disk

This test compares the time to load a component from disk

The following conditions were used

• A neutral Asset card
• Each test was run 5 times
• Each test ran 100 iterations (times below are for all iterations)
• Results are in seconds (lower is better)

Plugin	Run 1	Run 2	Run 3	Run 4	Run 5
AHLCG plugin	11.09	10.84	10.78	10.70	10.71
Hades	2.46	2.27	2.24	2.24	2.23

Summary - Hades is ~4-5 times faster

Editor/user interface creation

This test measures the time to create the editor interface (controls and preview panel)

The following conditions were used

• A neutral Asset card
• Each test was run 5 times
• Each test ran 100 iterations (times below are for all iterations)
• Results are in seconds (lower is better)

Plugin	Run 1	Run 2	Run 3	Run 4	Run 5
AHLCG plugin	236.84	Out of memory
Hades	12.25	11.99	12.34	12.07	12.20

Summary - Hades is ~19-20 times faster

Card rendering

This test measures how long to paint the card, both front and back face

The following conditions were used

• A neutral Asset card
• Each test was run 5 times
• Each test ran 100 iterations (times below are for all iterations)
• Results are in seconds (lower is better)

Plugin	Run 1	Run 2	Run 3	Run 4	Run 5
AHLCG plugin	238.25	237.90	241.87	240.59	236.83
Hades	25.20	24.71	24.93	25.00	24.78

Summary - Hades is ~9-10 times faster

This site is open source. Improve this page.